Bleeding Talent to the KHL

2008 brought us the birth of Europe's top rankedbeen more) amount to what could be a Stanley Cup
hockey league - the KHL (Kontinental Hockey League),contending team in the NHL. While some of them
formed from the preexisting Russian Superleague.(Lindstrom, Motzko, Sprukts, Ramo) weren't getting the
Almost immediately, KHL teams were able to lure overchances they deserved in the NHL, others are
NHLers and get them signed to hefty contracts.considerable losses. It now looks as if there won't be
The KHL and NHL have reached an agreement inmuch the Detroit Red Wings or the NHL can do to
principle, whereby each league honours the contractsstop Jiri Hudler from signing with the KHL. Next up may
of the other. However, there is still a lot of controversybe Nikolai Zherdev, who is set to become a UFA
surrounding what is becoming dubbed "KHL poaching"within the next 24 hours if the New York Rangers
- the loss of quality NHL players to the KHL.decide not to sign him to the $3.9 million contract he
While I don't want to get into the whole uproar, I wouldwas awarded in arbitration, and aren't able to trade him
like to point out that the NHL has been getting some ofto a team who will. There has been some interest in
it's best talent out of Russia for quite some time.Zherdev from the Toronto Maple Leafs, but it wouldn't
Vladislav Tretiak, Viacheslav Fetisov, Sergei Makarov,surprise me to see him wind up in the KHL.
Igor Larionov, Darius Kasparaitis, Vladimir Konstantinov,Without a doubt, many NHL teams would have loved
Alexander Mogilny, Pavel Bure, and Sergei Fedorovto sign these players... So where is the problem? The
were all Russian-born players. No hockey fan canhuge contracts and lowered income taxes are surely
deny the presence of current Russian talent likenot the only motivation for players to leave for the
Alexander Ovechkin, Evgeni Malkin, Pavel Datsyuk, IlyaKHL - why can't NHL teams compete?
Kovalchuk, Alexander Semin, Alex Kovalev, SergeiIt is my opinion that the culprit lies in the salary cap. For
Gonchar, Andrei Markov, and Evgeni Nabokov. Wouldone thing, teams are pressed so tightly against the cap
the league be the same without them? I don't think so.ceiling that they can't afford to offer many high-priced,
In the end, the onus is on the player to sign where hecompetitive contracts - even if they would be in the
wants to play. The KHL cannot be blamed for trying tofinancial position to do so. Furthermore, the following
lure quality players to their league, especially when youseason's salary cap is presently calculated using the
consider the longstanding tradition of top-end Russiancurrent season's league revenues - which makes it an
talent migrating to North America. For NHL fans likeunknown, especially in tough economic times. The
myself, however, it is impossible to ignore the loss ofsalary cap/floor was intended to achieve league parity,
talent we are experiencing. Here is a condensed list ofbut so far it has done anything but that. As of this
some NHLers who left to the KHL last summer:writing, the Chicago Blackhawks are the team with the
Jaromir Jagrhighest payroll - just under $60 million. The Nashville
Alexander RadulovPredators are the team with the lowest payroll, at two
Marcel Hossathirds of that - just over $40 million. Does that sound
Ladislav Nagylike parity?
Marcus NilsonBut while it's easy to gripe about the cap, solutions are
Chris Simonharder to come by. I have read around and done my
Sergei Brylinbest to come up with a few ideas for potential
Andrei Zyuzinanswers to the problem... which one do you like best?
Jozef Stumpel1 - Change the salary cap by making it no longer
Branko Radivojevicbased on league revenue, so that tough economic
Josef Vasicektimes and lowered ticket sales won't mean a diluted
Karel Rachunektalent pool, which would further diminish revenues.
Bryan Berard2 - Allow teams to go over the cap, but increase the
Ray Emerypercentage of revenues that team must share if they
A future Hall of Famer, a few veterans who haddo. This would give big market teams the ability to
skated in more than 500 NHL games, and a solidoffer big contracts, while even further helping the
bunch of promising young players - all, with maybe onesmaller market clubs.
exception, who could have played in the NHL last3 - Get clubs out of small markets where revenue is
season. Now take a look at who the NHL has lost solow, unstable, and dependant on other franchises. This
far this summer:would help increase revenues league-wide, possibly
Sergei Fedorovcircumventing some of the cap's negative risks.
Viktor Kozlov4 - Introduce cap discounts to teams who sign
Sergei Zubovhomegrown players. In other words, if a team is
Sandis Ozolinshrenegotiating a contract with a player they originally
Dmitri Kalinindrafted, a discount of somewhere between 20-40%
Richard Zednikcould be applied to that player's cap hit. This option
Radek Bonkwould let teams retain talent that they have developed,
Ville Peltonenwhile still allowing them to be active on the free agent
Daniel Tjarnqvistmarket.
Joakim LindstromSo what do you think? Feel free to let me know which
Joe Motzkooption you think is best, or suggest one of your own in
Janis Spruktsthe comments section. I like the 4th option most, as it
Martin Gerberputs more emphasis on solid drafting and organizational
Mikael Tellqvistskills. Mind you, I think the 2nd option would be easiest
Karri Ramoto administer. Implementing both options could be a
Starting to feel a bit nervous? I don't blame you - overpossibility as well...
the last two years, these losses alone (and there have