Learn to play inline hockey


To Prepare for Future Challenges, Throw Away Your Hockey Stick Forecasts

Optimism about the future certainly has abusiness executives became excited about
positive place in the overall scheme ofcreating a new piece of equipment that would
things, but it is frequently found to fuelgreatly reduce the cost for customers.
wishful thinking. Consider the typicalLeading technical consultants from the East
hockey-stick  forecast  of  the  future.were brought in to this Mid-western business,
and the consultants confirmed a rosy
Let's say your operation has been doingtechnology forecast and market for the
poorly. In fact, results as measured byproduct.
revenues  and  profits  have  been  dropping.
The company's chief financial officer was
You sit down and plan ways to overcome thisunconvinced, so he decided to monitor the
negative trend. Because the solutions takesituation closely. What he discovered was
time and money, you plan for things to getthat compared to the original business plan
worse in the immediate near term, but youon which the new product development
optimistically assume that all your new plansinvestment was based, the cost of
will work, causing the organization's resultsimplementing the project and time to
to  turn  up  at  some  point  in the future.completion increased regularly every six
months.
With this viewpoint, a graph of the
operation's revenues and profits over timeAt the same time, the estimated future sales
will look like a hockey stick with the past,and profits from the new equipment kept
present, and near-term future going down likedropping every six months. He drew a chart
the length of the stick, and the futureshowing that if this changing forecast trend
turning up like its blade as the stick restcontinued, the project would be a big money
on the ice at the point where the length andloser.
the blade meet. After a few years of
implementing this plan, you often find thatHe got nowhere with his observations.
the only part of the hockey stick you can seeEveryone else wanted to believe in the
when you examine the results is a handleproduct's success, so the project continued.
still  going  down.Sure enough, the project was a big loser in
the  end.
In the 1980s, a leading business equipment
company was faced with declining demand forOne way to have overcome this problem would
its most profitable product line. Sales andhave been to authorize the project based on
earnings inched up a little based on servicethe contingency of meeting interim targets
revenues for the previously sold andfor cost, product performance, on-time
installed equipment base, but new equipmentcompletion, profit and market outlook. Then
sales were dropping rapidly. Using awhen those factors weakened, the plug would
technique called "gap planning," thehave been pulled automatically and most of
operation looked for ways to fill the "gap"the costs could have been avoided. If the
between its current direction and what itproject had been going well, these interim
wanted  to  accomplish.targets would not have harmed the project's
ultimate success in any way.
After rejecting several alternatives, the



1 A B C D E F 89 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134